Trust Capital: The Strategic Asset Organizations Can’t Afford to Ignore
Governing Boards Part-14
By Rick Aman on"Reputation is what others think about you. Character is what you really are. Integrity is when the two are aligned." - John Wooden
In the life of any organization, few assets are more critical, or more easily overlooked, than trust capital. Trust capital is the reserve of credibility, goodwill, and confidence that a leader or an institution builds over time through consistent behavior, aligned values, and transparent communication. It becomes the silent strength an organization calls upon during moments of crisis, change, or opportunity. As someone who has spent decades leading organizations, I can tell you that trust capital is often the difference between an institution that weathers the storm and one that is permanently damaged by it.
Building Trust Capital: The Long Game
Building trust capital is not a marketing campaign, a one-time initiative, or something that can be delegated exclusively to the social media office. It is a slow, deliberate process that requires aligning words and actions across all levels of leadership and governance. Organizations earn trust capital the same way individuals do, through countless small actions over time that demonstrate integrity, consistency, and a genuine commitment to stakeholders.
In my experience working for public colleges and with private organizations, the cultures that successfully build trust capital are the ones that consistently return to their core values. They embed those values not just in public statements but in daily decisions, hiring practices, customer interactions, and leadership behavior. Boards can send powerful signals about trustworthiness. Their level of transparency, how they handle executive transitions, and even how they conduct meetings either reinforce or undermine the organization’s trust reserves.
Trust must be earned long before it is needed. Once a crisis emerges, it is too late to start building credibility. I often remind leadership teams that trust is like financial capital: the more you deposit through consistent, values-based behavior, the more you have available when you truly need to draw on it. Without those deposits, the organization finds itself in overdraft, trying to buy loyalty it has not earned.
Throughout my leadership career, I have often turned to what I call the Three Fs to guide the building of trust capital: Focus, Favor, and Follow Through. Focus means concentrating energy on the most important items rather than trying to address everything at once. Leaders who focus demonstrate discipline and clarity, two qualities that inspire confidence. Favor means maintaining a spirit of collaboration, working to find common ground with as many stakeholders as possible without compromising core values. Favor is not about agreeing with everyone but about signaling a genuine respect for differing perspectives. And Follow Through is about keeping promises. If you say you will do something, do it. Nothing erodes trust faster than broken commitments, and nothing builds it faster than consistently delivering on what you say.
Withdrawing Trust Capital: Crisis, Change, and Reputation Risk
Every organization will face moments when it must draw from its reserve of trust. A leadership scandal, a data breach, a major restructuring, or even a global disruption like the pandemic, will require leaders to lean heavily on the credibility they have built. In these high-stakes moments, trust capital becomes a strategic asset more valuable than financial resources or marketing budgets.
Yet not every organization manages these withdrawals wisely. I have seen institutions approach crises assuming that trust is automatic, not realizing that trust must be actively nurtured even in the middle of difficulty. When leadership fails to acknowledge mistakes, when communication becomes defensive or opaque, or when the organization prioritizes short-term gains over long-term values, trust is quickly eroded. In some cases, the depletion is so significant that recovery becomes nearly impossible.
Examples of trust erosion are visible across many sectors. In higher education, institutions that responded poorly to COVID-19 disruptions, offering limited transparency about tuition refunds or remote learning standards experienced significant reputational damage. Similarly, in the private sector, Boeing’s trust capital was severely impacted by a series of safety incidents and compliance failures. A particularly high-profile event involved a door panel detaching mid-flight on a 737 MAX aircraft, raising widespread concerns about manufacturing quality and oversight. These failures led to renewed regulatory scrutiny and public skepticism, severely undermining confidence in Boeing’s long-standing reputation for safety and reliability.
One of the critical lessons I emphasize when working with leadership teams is that trust withdrawals are inevitable, but the magnitude of the withdrawal is not. Organizations that have carefully managed their reputations can weather even severe crises, drawing on the goodwill they have earned. Those that have neglected trust building will find themselves scrambling for credibility when it is most needed and often find that it is nowhere to be found.
Reinvesting in Trust: Recovering and Strengthening
Although trust can be damaged, it is not necessarily lost forever. I often encourage leaders to think of rebuilding trust the way an investor thinks about reinvesting capital: it requires strategic, steady, and visible work overtime. The first step in restoring trust is transparency. Leaders must openly acknowledge what went wrong, without defensiveness or spin. Stakeholders appreciate honesty far more than they appreciate perfection.
Accountability is the next critical piece. Organizations must not only admit mistakes but demonstrate clear actions to address them. This includes setting up structures for internal review, creating channels for stakeholder feedback, and making tangible policy or operational changes that signal a commitment to doing better.
Consistent communication is the third pillar of trust recovery. It is not enough to make one statement and move on. Leaders must keep stakeholders informed throughout the recovery process, reinforcing key messages and demonstrating progress with actions, not just words. Silence, in times of recovery, is almost always interpreted as indifference or incompetence.
In rebuilding trust, leadership behavior is paramount. Boards must take an active role in overseeing recovery efforts, ensuring that the organization remains accountable not only internally but externally as well. A strong board can serve as an important credibility bridge to stakeholders, demonstrating that governance structures are working as intended. Likewise, the CEO and senior leadership must model the kind of transparency, humility, and integrity that inspires confidence. It cannot be delegated; it must be lived.
Challenges to Maintaining Trust Capital
While trust capital can be rebuilt, maintaining it over time remains a constant challenge for higher education institutions and their boards. One of the greatest risks is complacency. After periods of success such as enrollment growth, strong accreditation outcomes, or positive public recognition there can be a tendency to assume that trust will sustain itself. Without continued focus on transparency, academic quality, and mission alignment, even respected institutions can slowly erode the goodwill they have worked hard to build.
Leadership transitions, questions about the quality of instruction, and institutional responses to social or political issues all create moments of heightened vulnerability. A leadership change without clear communication, a perceived decline in academic rigor, or vague messaging during sensitive societal debates can quickly strain stakeholder trust. Likewise, reactions to funding cuts, tuition increases, or new fees can create flashpoints where students, families, and the broader community feel unheard or marginalized. In a world of rapid information sharing and public scrutiny, even minor missteps can escalate quickly if not managed with consistency, clarity, and authenticity.
Maintaining trust capital demands proactive leadership at every level. It requires visible commitment to the institution’s mission, high standards in academic and campus life, and steady, principled communication, especially during moments of change or controversy. Trust, once earned, must be safeguarded deliberately and renewed continuously. In higher education, or with any public organization, reputation remains both a precious asset and a fragile one.
Closing Thought
Trust capital is invisible until it is urgently needed, and by then, it is too late to build it. Leaders and organizations who understand this truth, and who treat trust as a strategic asset, position themselves not just for resilience during crises but for enduring influence and loyalty over the long term. It is the ultimate competitive advantage, built quietly, tested fiercely, and rewarded generously over time.
------
At Aman and Associates, we help community colleges and mission-driven organizations navigate the future with clarity and purpose. Leadership today requires more than vision; it demands the ability to anticipate change, align stakeholders, and act with strategic intent. Through futuring, governance support, and board and leadership development, we guide institutions as they define and achieve their preferred future. Whether preparing for accreditation, leading a board retreat, or sharpening strategic direction, we bring clarity, care, and commitment to strengthening your institution’s reputation, relevance, and resilience.
Rick Aman, PhD
rick@rickaman.com
www.rickaman.com/articles
31849